Imran’s cipher case sentence: US State Dept says ‘It's matter for Pakistani courts’

Imran’s cipher case sentence: US State Dept says ‘It's matter for Pakistani courts’

Washington (Web Desk): The United States State Department has termed Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan’s sentence in the cipher case as a ‘matter for the Pakistani courts’.

Addressing the daily press briefing, the department’s spokesperson Matthew Miller said that Khan’s sentencing was a legal matter ultimately for the Pakistani courts.

“We have been following the case, cases I should say — plural, brought against the former prime minister but do not have any comments on the sentencing,” he said.

On Tuesday, a special court formed to hear cases under Special Secret Act handed Imran Khan and former foreign minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi 10 years jail sentence in cipher case.

Special court Judge Abul Hasnat Zulqarnain announced the verdict during the hearing held at the Adiala Jail in Rawalpindi.

At the outset of the hearing, Imran and Qureshi were given a questionnaire under Section 342 of the Pakistan Penal Code.

After the former premier recorded his statement, the court asked him about the whereabouts of the cipher, to which he replied: “I have said the same in my statement that I do not know. The cipher was in my office.”

Before announcing the verdict, Judge Zulqarnain, during the hearing, reminded the PTI leaders that their lawyers were not appearing in court and were given state lawyers.

On January 27, the special court appointed state counsels for both Khan and Qureshi in the case as lawyers representing the accused were absent from court proceedings.

On September 30, the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) had submitted a challan, a charge sheet, in a special court established under the Official Secrets Act naming Imran Khan and Shah Mahmood Qureshi as the principal accused in the case. The two pleaded not guilty.

Previously, the cipher trial had started inside the Adiala jail but an Islamabad High Court (IHC) division bench later annulled all those proceedings, ordering a fresh open court trial.